Because the problems of inconsistency and unfairness that were inherent in the procedural posture of Lapides are absent here, and because an Indian tribe's sovereign immunity is of a far different character than a state's Eleventh Amendment immunity, we decline to extend Lapides.

The district court rejected all three arguments, and we now affirm. 1640, 152 L.Ed.2d 806 (2002) Contour also says that Congress has authorized its suit by creating an implied cause of action under the Indian Civil Rights Act and finally, Contour argues that principles of equitable estoppel prevent the Tribe from asserting immunity. Contour offers three reasons to avoid immunity: first, and most basic, Contour claims that the Tribe's removal of this case to federal court constitutes a voluntary waiver of the Tribe's immunity, relying on the Supreme Court's Eleventh Amendment case of Lapides v. Contour appeals from a district court order dismissing its Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on account of the Tribe's sovereign immunity. This case arises out of a leasing agreement between Contour Spa (вЂњContourвЂќ) and the Seminole Tribe of Florida (вЂњthe TribeвЂќ) that turned sour.

Rogow, PA, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for PlaintiffвЂ“Appellant.Дonald Albert Orlovsky, Kamen & Orlovsky, PA, West Palm Beach, FL, for DefendantвЂ“Appellee.ДЄppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.Д«efore MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and EVANS, * District Judge. SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Mitchell Cypress, et al., DefendantsвЂ“Appellees.Д«ruce Stephen Rogow, Bruce S. CONTOUR SPA AT THE HARD ROCK, INC., a Florida corporation, PlaintiffвЂ“Appellant,

Contour day spa hard rock hollywood fl